Act like a helpful tutor and exlain me : Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:|
Question:
Act like a helpful tutor and exlain me :
Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:|
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: manish kumar
Created at: 2025-09-26 08:12:54
Asked by: manish kumar
Created at: 2025-09-26 08:12:54
Final Answer:
Rendered
Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Sure! Let's break down the **problem** and solve it step by step.
---
## **Problem Statement (Rewritten for Clarity)**
- **Air compressor**: Compresses air from **100 kPa, 17°C** to **1 MPa** at a **rate of 100 L/min**.
- **Exit temperature**: **80°C**
- **Find**:
1. **Power input** to the compressor (**kW**).
2. **Isentropic efficiency** of the compressor.
---
## **Step 1: System Diagram and Given Data**
### **Given:**
- **Inlet pressure (\(P_1\))**: 100 kPa
- **Inlet temp (\(T_1\))**: 17°C = 290 K
- **Exit pressure (\(P_2\))**: 1 MPa = 100 kPa
- **Exit temp (\(T_2\))**: 80°C = 353 K
- **Volumetric flow (\(\dot{V}_1\))**: 100 L/min = 1 m³/min = 1/60 m³/s ≈ .01667 m³/s
---
## **Step 2: Calculate Mass Flow Rate (\(\dot{m}\))**
Use the **ideal gas law** at the inlet:
\[
\dot{m} = \frac{P_1 \dot{V}_1}{R T_1}
\]
Where:
- \(R\) for air = .287 kJ/kg·K = 287 J/kg·K
Plug in values (convert \(P_1\) to Pa):
\[
P_1 = 100\,kPa = 100,000\,Pa
\]
\[
T_1 = 17^\circ C = 290\,K
\]
\[
\dot{V}_1 = .01667\,m^3/s
\]
\[
\dot{m} = \frac{100{,}000 \times .01667}{287 \times 290}
\]
\[
\dot{m} = \frac{1667}{83230}
\]
\[
\dot{m} \approx .020\,kg/s
\]
---
## **Step 3: Power Input Calculation**
Compressor power input (steady flow energy eq., neglecting kinetic and potential energy):
\[
\dot{W}_{\text{input}} = \dot{m} (h_2 - h_1)
\]
For air, use \(h = c_p T\) (approx. for ideal gas):
- \(c_p\) for air ≈ 1.005 kJ/kg·K
\[
h_1 = c_p T_1 = 1.005 \times 290 = 291.5\,kJ/kg
\]
\[
h_2 = c_p T_2 = 1.005 \times 353 = 354.8\,kJ/kg
\]
\[
\Delta h = h_2 - h_1 = 354.8 - 291.5 = 63.3\,kJ/kg
\]
\[
\dot{W}_{\text{input}} = .02 \times 63.3 = 1.266\,kW
\]
---
## **Step 4: Isentropic Efficiency Calculation**
Isentropic efficiency (\(\eta_c\)) of a compressor:
\[
\eta_c = \frac{h_{2s} - h_1}{h_2 - h_1}
\]
Where \(h_{2s}\) is the enthalpy at the exit pressure if the process were isentropic.
### **Calculate \(T_{2s}\):**
For an isentropic process in an ideal gas:
\[
\frac{T_{2s}}{T_1} = \left( \frac{P_2}{P_1} \right)^{\frac{k-1}{k}}
\]
- For air, \(k = 1.4\)
\[
\frac{T_{2s}}{290} = \left( \frac{100}{100} \right)^{\frac{.4}{1.4}}
\]
\[
= (10)^{.286}
\]
\[
= 1.93
\]
\[
T_{2s} = 1.93 \times 290 = 560 \,K
\]
Wait! This is much higher than the actual exit temperature. Let's double-check this:
\[
n = \frac{k-1}{k} = \frac{.4}{1.4} \approx .286
\]
\[
T_{2s} = 290 \times 10^{.286} \approx 290 \times 1.93 = 560\,K
\]
That is correct.
\[
h_{2s} = c_p T_{2s} = 1.005 \times 560 = 563\,kJ/kg
\]
Now use the efficiency formula:
\[
\eta_c = \frac{h_{2s} - h_1}{h_2 - h_1} = \frac{563 - 291.5}{354.8 - 291.5}
\]
\[
= \frac{271.5}{63.3} = 4.29
\]
This is much greater than 1, which is **not physically possible**. Let's check the steps for the isentropic temperature:
**The isentropic exit temperature should be lower than the actual, but here it's much higher.**
Wait, let's check the equations:
\[
\frac{T_{2s}}{T_1} = \left(\frac{P_2}{P_1}\right)^{\frac{k-1}{k}}
\]
\[
\frac{T_{2s}}{290} = (10)^{.286} = 1.93
\]
\[
T_{2s} = 1.93 \times 290 = 560\,K
\]
Given that the actual exit temperature is 353 K (80°C), the process is highly **irreversible** (real compressors usually have actual temperature higher than isentropic, not lower).
So, \(\eta_c\) is usually defined as:
\[
\eta_c = \frac{\text{Isentropic work}}{\text{Actual work}}
\]
In this case,
\[
\eta_c = \frac{h_{2s} - h_1}{h_2 - h_1}
\]
With our numbers:
\[
h_1 = 291.5\,kJ/kg
\]
\[
h_2 = 354.8\,kJ/kg
\]
\[
h_{2s} = 563\,kJ/kg
\]
\[
\eta_c = \frac{563 - 291.5}{354.8 - 291.5} = \frac{271.5}{63.3} = 4.29
\]
Again, this is not possible. The actual temperature should be higher than the isentropic, so something is off in the physicality of the problem's numbers.
But, following the method, **the calculation steps are correct**. The issue must be with the provided values (the exit temperature is usually *higher* than the isentropic, not lower).
---
## **Final Answers (with Explanation)**
### **1. The Power Input**
\[
\boxed{1.27 \text{ kW}}
\]
*(rounded from 1.266 kW)*
### **2. Isentropic Efficiency**
\[
\boxed{4.29}
\]
*(which is not physical; normally, efficiency should be less than 1. This might be a typo in the problem statement. Double-check exit temperature!)*
---
### **Summary Table**
| Quantity | Value |
|---------------------------|--------------------------|
| Mass flow rate (\(\dot{m}\)) | .02 kg/s |
| Power input (\(\dot{W}\)) | 1.27 kW |
| Isentropic efficiency | 4.29 (not physically possible) |
---
### **Key Steps:**
1. **Find mass flow rate using ideal gas law**.
2. **Calculate power input using enthalpy change**.
3. **Compute isentropic temperature and corresponding enthalpy**.
4. **Calculate isentropic efficiency**.
---
**Let me know if you want to discuss the result or clarify the steps further!**
📢 Instructions:
- Ask anything relatd to above question only.
- For new Question goto :
VIPSolutions