VIPSolutions logo ✨ VIPSolutions

Act like a helpful tutor and exlain me : Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:|

Question:

Act like a helpful tutor and exlain me : Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:Uploaded Image|

This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: manish kumar
Created at: 2025-09-26 08:12:54

Final Answer:

Rendered Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Sure! Let's break down the **problem** and solve it step by step. --- ## **Problem Statement (Rewritten for Clarity)** - **Air compressor**: Compresses air from **100 kPa, 17°C** to **1 MPa** at a **rate of 100 L/min**. - **Exit temperature**: **80°C** - **Find**: 1. **Power input** to the compressor (**kW**). 2. **Isentropic efficiency** of the compressor. --- ## **Step 1: System Diagram and Given Data** ### **Given:** - **Inlet pressure (\(P_1\))**: 100 kPa - **Inlet temp (\(T_1\))**: 17°C = 290 K - **Exit pressure (\(P_2\))**: 1 MPa = 100 kPa - **Exit temp (\(T_2\))**: 80°C = 353 K - **Volumetric flow (\(\dot{V}_1\))**: 100 L/min = 1 m³/min = 1/60 m³/s ≈ .01667 m³/s --- ## **Step 2: Calculate Mass Flow Rate (\(\dot{m}\))** Use the **ideal gas law** at the inlet: \[ \dot{m} = \frac{P_1 \dot{V}_1}{R T_1} \] Where: - \(R\) for air = .287 kJ/kg·K = 287 J/kg·K Plug in values (convert \(P_1\) to Pa): \[ P_1 = 100\,kPa = 100,000\,Pa \] \[ T_1 = 17^\circ C = 290\,K \] \[ \dot{V}_1 = .01667\,m^3/s \] \[ \dot{m} = \frac{100{,}000 \times .01667}{287 \times 290} \] \[ \dot{m} = \frac{1667}{83230} \] \[ \dot{m} \approx .020\,kg/s \] --- ## **Step 3: Power Input Calculation** Compressor power input (steady flow energy eq., neglecting kinetic and potential energy): \[ \dot{W}_{\text{input}} = \dot{m} (h_2 - h_1) \] For air, use \(h = c_p T\) (approx. for ideal gas): - \(c_p\) for air ≈ 1.005 kJ/kg·K \[ h_1 = c_p T_1 = 1.005 \times 290 = 291.5\,kJ/kg \] \[ h_2 = c_p T_2 = 1.005 \times 353 = 354.8\,kJ/kg \] \[ \Delta h = h_2 - h_1 = 354.8 - 291.5 = 63.3\,kJ/kg \] \[ \dot{W}_{\text{input}} = .02 \times 63.3 = 1.266\,kW \] --- ## **Step 4: Isentropic Efficiency Calculation** Isentropic efficiency (\(\eta_c\)) of a compressor: \[ \eta_c = \frac{h_{2s} - h_1}{h_2 - h_1} \] Where \(h_{2s}\) is the enthalpy at the exit pressure if the process were isentropic. ### **Calculate \(T_{2s}\):** For an isentropic process in an ideal gas: \[ \frac{T_{2s}}{T_1} = \left( \frac{P_2}{P_1} \right)^{\frac{k-1}{k}} \] - For air, \(k = 1.4\) \[ \frac{T_{2s}}{290} = \left( \frac{100}{100} \right)^{\frac{.4}{1.4}} \] \[ = (10)^{.286} \] \[ = 1.93 \] \[ T_{2s} = 1.93 \times 290 = 560 \,K \] Wait! This is much higher than the actual exit temperature. Let's double-check this: \[ n = \frac{k-1}{k} = \frac{.4}{1.4} \approx .286 \] \[ T_{2s} = 290 \times 10^{.286} \approx 290 \times 1.93 = 560\,K \] That is correct. \[ h_{2s} = c_p T_{2s} = 1.005 \times 560 = 563\,kJ/kg \] Now use the efficiency formula: \[ \eta_c = \frac{h_{2s} - h_1}{h_2 - h_1} = \frac{563 - 291.5}{354.8 - 291.5} \] \[ = \frac{271.5}{63.3} = 4.29 \] This is much greater than 1, which is **not physically possible**. Let's check the steps for the isentropic temperature: **The isentropic exit temperature should be lower than the actual, but here it's much higher.** Wait, let's check the equations: \[ \frac{T_{2s}}{T_1} = \left(\frac{P_2}{P_1}\right)^{\frac{k-1}{k}} \] \[ \frac{T_{2s}}{290} = (10)^{.286} = 1.93 \] \[ T_{2s} = 1.93 \times 290 = 560\,K \] Given that the actual exit temperature is 353 K (80°C), the process is highly **irreversible** (real compressors usually have actual temperature higher than isentropic, not lower). So, \(\eta_c\) is usually defined as: \[ \eta_c = \frac{\text{Isentropic work}}{\text{Actual work}} \] In this case, \[ \eta_c = \frac{h_{2s} - h_1}{h_2 - h_1} \] With our numbers: \[ h_1 = 291.5\,kJ/kg \] \[ h_2 = 354.8\,kJ/kg \] \[ h_{2s} = 563\,kJ/kg \] \[ \eta_c = \frac{563 - 291.5}{354.8 - 291.5} = \frac{271.5}{63.3} = 4.29 \] Again, this is not possible. The actual temperature should be higher than the isentropic, so something is off in the physicality of the problem's numbers. But, following the method, **the calculation steps are correct**. The issue must be with the provided values (the exit temperature is usually *higher* than the isentropic, not lower). --- ## **Final Answers (with Explanation)** ### **1. The Power Input** \[ \boxed{1.27 \text{ kW}} \] *(rounded from 1.266 kW)* ### **2. Isentropic Efficiency** \[ \boxed{4.29} \] *(which is not physical; normally, efficiency should be less than 1. This might be a typo in the problem statement. Double-check exit temperature!)* --- ### **Summary Table** | Quantity | Value | |---------------------------|--------------------------| | Mass flow rate (\(\dot{m}\)) | .02 kg/s | | Power input (\(\dot{W}\)) | 1.27 kW | | Isentropic efficiency | 4.29 (not physically possible) | --- ### **Key Steps:** 1. **Find mass flow rate using ideal gas law**. 2. **Calculate power input using enthalpy change**. 3. **Compute isentropic temperature and corresponding enthalpy**. 4. **Calculate isentropic efficiency**. --- **Let me know if you want to discuss the result or clarify the steps further!**

📢 Instructions:

  • Ask anything relatd to above question only.
  • For new Question goto :

Study Help, Fast Answers

VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.

Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.