Consider two isolated systems of non-interacting spins with NA = 4 and NB = 16 spins, respectively. Each spin has a magnetic moment µ that can point either up or down. The energies are simply the sums over the oriented magnetic moments and the initial energies are EA = ?2µ and EB = ?2µ.
1. What is the total number of microstates available to the composite system?
2. If the two systems are now allowed to exchange energy with one another, what is the probability that system A has energy EA?
3. What is the mean value
give answer with explanation at the end of each step and final answer at the end
Question:
Consider two isolated systems of non-interacting spins with NA = 4 and NB = 16 spins, respectively. Each spin has a magnetic moment µ that can point either up or down. The energies are simply the sums over the oriented magnetic moments and the initial energies are EA = ?2µ and EB = ?2µ.
1. What is the total number of microstates available to the composite system?
2. If the two systems are now allowed to exchange energy with one another, what is the probability that system A has energy EA?
3. What is the mean value
give answer with explanation at the end of each step and final answer at the end
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: amu
Created at: 2025-07-26 15:18:35
Final Answer:
RenderedRaw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's solve your problem step-by-step:
---
## **Given:**
- **System A:** \(N_A = 4\) spins
- **System B:** \(N_B = 16\) spins
- Each spin: magnetic moment \(\mu\), can be up or down
- Energy: for each up spin, energy \(-\mu\); for each down spin, \(+\mu\) (assuming magnetic field in +z direction, but the sign won't affect counting since we use energy differences)
- Initial energies: \(E_A = -2\mu\), \(E_B = -2\mu\)
- Non-interacting (so total number of microstates = product of microstates in each)
---
### **1. Total number of microstates of the composite system**
For a system of \(N\) spins, *regardless of energy*, each spin can be up or down:
- Number of microstates for \(N\) spins = \(2^N\)
So:
- System A: \(2^{4} = 16\)
- System B: \(2^{16} = 65536\)
- Composite system: \(16 \times 65536 = 1,048,576\)
**Explanation:**
Each spin is independent, so the total number of microstates is the product of the two systems' microstates.
**Final answer (1):**
\[
\boxed{1,048,576}
\]
---
### **2. Probability that system A has energy \(E_A\)**
#### **Step 1: What does "energy \(E_A\)" mean?**
- For each spin up: energy \(-\mu\)
- For each spin down: energy \(+\mu\)
- For \(N_A = 4\), total energy is:
\[
E_A = (n_\uparrow - n_\downarrow)\mu
\]
where \(n_\uparrow\) is the number of up spins, \(n_\downarrow = N_A - n_\uparrow\).
But it's more accurate to say \(E_A = (2n_\uparrow - N_A)\mu\).
Given \(E_A = -2\mu\):
\[
-2\mu = (2n_\uparrow - 4)\mu \implies 2n_\uparrow - 4 = -2 \implies n_\uparrow = 1
\]
So, number of up spins = 1, number of down spins = 3.
#### **Step 2: Number of microstates with \(E_A = -2\mu\):**
\[
\Omega_A(E_A) = \text{number of ways to choose 1 up out of 4} = \binom{4}{1} = 4
\]
#### **Step 3: System B must have the remaining energy:**
Total energy is conserved. If the total energy of the composite system is \(E_{\text{tot}}\), then after energy exchange:
\[
E_{\text{tot}} = E_A + E_B
\]
But since both are initially at \(-2\mu\), \(E_{\text{tot}} = -4\mu\).
If we want the probability that A has \(E_A = -2\mu\), then B must have \(E_B = -2\mu\).
#### **Step 4: Number of microstates for \(N_B = 16\) spins with \(E_B = -2\mu\):**
\[
E_B = (2n_\uparrow - 16)\mu = -2\mu \implies 2n_\uparrow - 16 = -2 \implies n_\uparrow = 7
\]
So, number of up spins in B = 7, down = 9.
Number of microstates:
\[
\Omega_B(E_B) = \binom{16}{7} = 11,\!440
\]
#### **Step 5: Total number of microstates with \(E_A = -2\mu\):**
\[
\Omega(E_A = -2\mu) = \Omega_A(E_A) \cdot \Omega_B(E_B) = 4 \times 11,440 = 45,760
\]
#### **Step 6: Probability:**
\[
P(E_A = -2\mu) = \frac{\text{# of microstates with }E_A = -2\mu}{\text{total # of microstates}}
= \frac{45,760}{1,048,576} \approx 0.0437
\]
**Explanation:**
You count all ways A can have 1 up spin, and B can have 7 up spins, and divide by the total possible microstates for the composite system.
**Final answer (2):**
\[
\boxed{0.0437} \text{ (or } 4.37\% \text{)}
\]
---
### **3. What is the mean value \(\langle E_A \rangle\)?**
#### **Step 1: By symmetry or direct calculation**
If the two systems are allowed to exchange energy freely, and all microstates are equally probable, the mean number of up spins in A is:
- For each of the 20 spins, up or down is equally likely in the absence of a field.
- On average, in A, you expect \(4 \times \frac{1}{2} = 2\) up spins.
But let's be precise:
Total number of up spins in the composite system is 10 (from initial conditions: both had 1 and 7 up spins, but after exchange, all microstates with 20 spins and \(E_{\text{tot}} = -4\mu\) are possible).
But actually, for all microstates of 20 spins with total energy \(-4\mu\), total number of up spins is \(n_{\uparrow, \text{tot}}\):
\[
(2n_{\uparrow, \text{tot}} - 20)\mu = -4\mu \implies n_{\uparrow, \text{tot}} = 8
\]
So, total number of up spins in the whole system is always 8.
When A has \(k\) up spins, B has \(8 - k\) up spins.
Number of ways for A to have \(k\) up spins:
\[
\binom{4}{k}
\]
Number of ways for B to have \(8 - k\) up spins:
\[
\binom{16}{8 - k}
\]
So total number of microstates with \(k\) up spins in A:
\[
\Omega(k) = \binom{4}{k} \binom{16}{8 - k}
\]
Probability that A has \(k\) up spins:
\[
P(k) = \frac{\Omega(k)}{\sum_{k=0}^4 \Omega(k)}
\]
But, sum over all possible \(k\):
- \(0 \leq k \leq 4\)
- For each \(k\), \(B\) must have \(8 - k\) up spins (\(0 \leq 8 - k \leq 16\)), but since \(k\) can go from 0 to 4, \(8 - k\) goes from 8 to 4.
So possible \(k = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4\)
Now, the mean value:
\[
\langle k \rangle = \sum_{k=0}^4 k P(k)
\]
and
\[
\langle E_A \rangle = (2 \langle k \rangle - 4)\mu
\]
#### **Calculation:**
Let's compute \(\Omega(k)\) for \(k = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4\):
- \(\binom{4}{0} = 1\), \(\binom{16}{8}\)
- \(\binom{4}{1} = 4\), \(\binom{16}{7}\)
- \(\binom{4}{2} = 6\), \(\binom{16}{6}\)
- \(\binom{4}{3} = 4\), \(\binom{16}{5}\)
- \(\binom{4}{4} = 1\), \(\binom{16}{4}\)
Calculate each:
- \(\binom{16}{8} = 12,870\)
- \(\binom{16}{7} = 11,440\)
- \(\binom{16}{6} = 8,008\)
- \(\binom{16}{5} = 4,368\)
- \(\binom{16}{4} = 1,820\)
So:
| \(k\) | \(\binom{4}{k}\) | \(\binom{16}{8-k}\) | \(\Omega(k)\) |
|-------|------------------|---------------------|--------------------|
| 0 | 1 | 12,870 | 12,870 |
| 1 | 4 | 11,440 | 45,760 |
| 2 | 6 | 8,008 | 48,048 |
| 3 | 4 | 4,368 | 17,472 |
| 4 | 1 | 1,820 | 1,820 |
Sum: \(12,870 + 45,760 + 48,048 + 17,472 + 1,820 = 125,970\)
Now, \(P(k) = \frac{\Omega(k)}{125,970}\)
Compute \(\langle k \rangle\):
\[
\langle k \rangle = \sum_{k=0}^4 k \frac{\Omega(k)}{125,970}
= \frac{1 \cdot 45,760 + 2 \cdot 48,048 + 3 \cdot 17,472 + 4 \cdot 1,820}{125,970}
\]
Let's multiply out:
- \(1 \cdot 45,760 = 45,760\)
- \(2 \cdot 48,048 = 96,096\)
- \(3 \cdot 17,472 = 52,416\)
- \(4 \cdot 1,820 = 7,280\)
Sum numerator:
\[
45,760 + 96,096 + 52,416 + 7,280 = 201,552
\]
So:
\[
\langle k \rangle = \frac{201,552}{125,970} \approx 1.6
\]
Therefore,
\[
\langle E_A \rangle = (2 \times 1.6 - 4)\mu = (3.2 - 4)\mu = -0.8\mu
\]
**Explanation:**
We use the microcanonical ensemble: all microstates with total energy \(-4\mu\) are equally probable. The mean number of up spins in A can be found by weighted average.
**Final answer (3):**
\[
\boxed{\langle E_A \rangle = -0.8\mu}
\]
---
## **Summary of Answers**
**1. Total number of microstates:**
\[
\boxed{1,048,576}
\]
**2. Probability that system A has \(E_A = -2\mu\):**
\[
\boxed{0.0437} \;\; (4.37\%)
\]
**3. Mean value \(\langle E_A \rangle\):**
\[
\boxed{-0.8\mu}
\]
Feel free to ask if you need further clarifications!
VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.
Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.