Exercise 8.4.2:In this problem, we consider indexes for the relation Ships (name, class, launched) from our running battleships exercise. Assume: i. name is the key. i. The relation Ships is stored over 50 pages. iii. The relation is clustered on class so we expect that only one disk access is needed to find the ships of a given class. iv. On average, there are 5 ships of a class, and 25 ships launched in any given year. v. With probability P1 the operation on this relation is a query of the form SELECT * FROM Ships WHERE name = n. vi. With probability P2 the operation on this relation is a query of the form SELECT * FROM Ships WHERE class = c. vii. With probability p3 the operation on this relation is a query of the form SELECT * FROM Ships WHERE launched = y. viii. With probability 1 - P - P2 - P3 the operation on this relation is an insertion of a new tuple into Ships. Consider the creation of indexes on name, class, and launched. For each combination of indexes, estimate the average cost of an operation. As a function of P1, P2, and p3, what is the best choice of indexes?
Question:
Exercise 8.4.2:In this problem, we consider indexes for the relation Ships (name, class, launched) from our running battleships exercise. Assume: i. name is the key. i. The relation Ships is stored over 50 pages. iii. The relation is clustered on class so we expect that only one disk access is needed to find the ships of a given class. iv. On average, there are 5 ships of a class, and 25 ships launched in any given year. v. With probability P1 the operation on this relation is a query of the form SELECT * FROM Ships WHERE name = n. vi. With probability P2 the operation on this relation is a query of the form SELECT * FROM Ships WHERE class = c. vii. With probability p3 the operation on this relation is a query of the form SELECT * FROM Ships WHERE launched = y. viii. With probability 1 - P - P2 - P3 the operation on this relation is an insertion of a new tuple into Ships. Consider the creation of indexes on name, class, and launched. For each combination of indexes, estimate the average cost of an operation. As a function of P1, P2, and p3, what is the best choice of indexes?
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: Umesh
Created at: 2025-08-03 23:03:23
Final Answer:
RenderedRaw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's break down the problem and compute the **average cost** for each possible combination of indexes, using the assumptions given.
## 1. **Data and Probabilities**
- **Ships(name, class, launched)**
- 50 pages for the relation.
- **name** is the key.
- Clustered on **class** (all ships of a class together on a page).
- 5 ships per class (on average).
- 25 ships per launch year (on average).
- **P1**: Probability of query `WHERE name = n`
- **P2**: Probability of query `WHERE class = c`
- **P3**: Probability of query `WHERE launched = y`
- Probability of insertion: `1 - P1 - P2 - P3`
We are to consider indexes on **name**, **class**, **launched**, and combinations thereof.
---
## 2. **Access Costs**
### **A. No Index**
- **WHERE name = n**: Must scan all 50 pages (since name is not indexed and not clustered). **Cost: 50 I/Os**
- **WHERE class = c**: Clustered on class; only 1 I/O needed (all ships of a class are together). **Cost: 1 I/O**
- **WHERE launched = y**: Not clustered, not indexed. Must scan all 50 pages. **Cost: 50 I/Os**
- **Insertion**: Write to appropriate spot; assuming 1 I/O.
---
### **B. Index on name (Assume B+ tree, unclustered)**
- **WHERE name = n**: Since name is key and indexed, can access efficiently.
- B+ tree over 50 pages = tree height ≈ 2-3.
- Access index (2 I/Os), then data (1 I/O). **Total: 3 I/Os**
- **class**: No change (still clustered): **1 I/O**
- **launched**: No index: **50 I/Os**
- **Insertion**: Must update both data and index: **2 I/Os**
---
### **C. Index on class (clustered)**
- **WHERE name = n**: No index, must scan all pages: **50 I/Os**
- **WHERE class = c**: Clustered index, can go directly to the page(s): **1 I/O**
- **WHERE launched = y**: No index: **50 I/Os**
- **Insertion**: Update data and index: **2 I/Os**
---
### **D. Index on launched (unclustered)**
- **WHERE name = n**: No index: **50 I/Os**
- **WHERE class = c**: Clustered, so 1 I/O
- **WHERE launched = y**: Unclustered index.
- Average 25 ships per year, so 25 index entries.
- Index access (2 I/Os), then 25 data fetches (since unclustered): **27 I/Os**
- **Insertion**: Update data and index: **2 I/Os**
---
### **E. Indexes on name & class**
- **name**: 3 I/Os
- **class**: 1 I/O
- **launched**: 50 I/Os
- **Insertion**: 3 I/Os
---
### **F. Indexes on name & launched**
- **name**: 3 I/Os
- **class**: 1 I/O
- **launched**: 27 I/Os
- **Insertion**: 3 I/Os
---
### **G. Indexes on class & launched**
- **name**: 50 I/Os
- **class**: 1 I/O
- **launched**: 27 I/Os
- **Insertion**: 3 I/Os
---
### **H. Indexes on name, class, and launched**
- **name**: 3 I/Os
- **class**: 1 I/O
- **launched**: 27 I/Os
- **Insertion**: 4 I/Os
---
## 3. **Average Cost of an Operation**
Let’s define the average cost as:
\[
\text{Average cost} = P_1 \cdot C_1 + P_2 \cdot C_2 + P_3 \cdot C_3 + (1 - P_1 - P_2 - P_3) \cdot C_{\text{ins}}
\]
Where \(C_1, C_2, C_3, C_{\text{ins}}\) are the costs (in I/Os) for each type of operation.
---
## 4. **Summary Table**
| Indexes | name | class | launched | Insertion | Avg Cost Formula (I/Os) |
|---------------------|------|-------|----------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| None | 50 | 1 | 50 | 1 | \( P_1 \cdot 50 + P_2 \cdot 1 + P_3 \cdot 50 + (1-P_1-P_2-P_3) \cdot 1 \) |
| name | 3 | 1 | 50 | 2 | \( P_1 \cdot 3 + P_2 \cdot 1 + P_3 \cdot 50 + (1-P_1-P_2-P_3) \cdot 2 \) |
| class | 50 | 1 | 50 | 2 | \( P_1 \cdot 50 + P_2 \cdot 1 + P_3 \cdot 50 + (1-P_1-P_2-P_3) \cdot 2 \) |
| launched | 50 | 1 | 27 | 2 | \( P_1 \cdot 50 + P_2 \cdot 1 + P_3 \cdot 27 + (1-P_1-P_2-P_3) \cdot 2 \) |
| name, class | 3 | 1 | 50 | 3 | \( P_1 \cdot 3 + P_2 \cdot 1 + P_3 \cdot 50 + (1-P_1-P_2-P_3) \cdot 3 \) |
| name, launched | 3 | 1 | 27 | 3 | \( P_1 \cdot 3 + P_2 \cdot 1 + P_3 \cdot 27 + (1-P_1-P_2-P_3) \cdot 3 \) |
| class, launched | 50 | 1 | 27 | 3 | \( P_1 \cdot 50 + P_2 \cdot 1 + P_3 \cdot 27 + (1-P_1-P_2-P_3) \cdot 3 \) |
| name, class, launched| 3 | 1 | 27 | 4 | \( P_1 \cdot 3 + P_2 \cdot 1 + P_3 \cdot 27 + (1-P_1-P_2-P_3) \cdot 4 \) |
---
## 5. **Which Indexes Are Best?**
- The best index combination **minimizes** the average cost formula above, depending on the values of \(P_1, P_2, P_3\).
- If queries for **name** are most frequent (\(P_1\) large), you want an index on **name**.
- If queries for **launched** are frequent (\(P_3\) large), you want an index on **launched** (since otherwise it's 50 I/Os vs 27 with index).
- If insertions are frequent (\(1-P_1-P_2-P_3\) large), avoid extra indexes since they increase insertion cost.
**In most practical cases:**
- If \(P_1\) and/or \(P_3\) are significant, **having indexes on name and launched is optimal**.
- If only \(P_1\) is significant, only index on **name**.
- If only \(P_3\) is significant, only index on **launched**.
- If all three query types are frequent, index on **name** and **launched** (index on class is less useful since clustered already).
---
### **General Recommendation**
The best indexes as a function of \(P_1, P_2, P_3\) is the combination that minimizes
\[
P_1 \cdot C_1 + P_2 \cdot C_2 + P_3 \cdot C_3 + (1 - P_1 - P_2 - P_3) \cdot C_{\text{ins}}
\]
where \(C_1, C_2, C_3, C_{\text{ins}}\) are as in the table above.
- **If \(P_1, P_3\) are both substantial, index on both name and launched.**
- **If only \(P_1\) is large, index on name.**
- **If only \(P_3\) is large, index on launched.**
- **If insertions dominate, use fewer indexes.**
---
## **Summary Table for Formula**
**For any index set, plug in the corresponding costs and your values for \(P_1, P_2, P_3\). Choose the index set that gives the lowest average cost.**
---
**If you want a concise answer:**
> **The best choice of indexes is the one (from the table above) that minimizes**
>
> \[
> \text{Average cost} = P_1 \cdot C_1 + P_2 \cdot C_2 + P_3 \cdot C_3 + (1 - P_1 - P_2 - P_3) \cdot C_{\text{ins}}
> \]
>
> **where the costs \(C_1, C_2, C_3, C_{\text{ins}}\) for each index combination are given in the table above.**
> **Choose the combination with the lowest average cost for your specific values of \(P_1, P_2, P_3\).**
VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.
Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.