Give step-by-step explanationA project manager labelled the jobs A to T to develop a 20-job network required to construct 2 ’
small project. Each job was listed with all its predecessors as clearly as possible. The table below
shows these jobs and their predecessors, if any
Predecessors | Job | Predecessors
F ABC [IES G
EC a
15 etl ed kabid
D AB [FEL] DEF IX HILL
cL
P MN Q 0,P R | JKL0
id |
A. hich ia) redcesrs son could be slime ithot affecting oe ev logic?
(5%)
5B. Dra an sow diagram for tis rjc. 10%)
O Files
Question:
Give step-by-step explanationA project manager labelled the jobs A to T to develop a 20-job network required to construct 2 ’
small project. Each job was listed with all its predecessors as clearly as possible. The table below
shows these jobs and their predecessors, if any
Predecessors | Job | Predecessors
F ABC [IES G
EC a
15 etl ed kabid
D AB [FEL] DEF IX HILL
cL
P MN Q 0,P R | JKL0
id |
A. hich ia) redcesrs son could be slime ithot affecting oe ev logic?
(5%)
5B. Dra an sow diagram for tis rjc. 10%)
O Files
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: coochbehar
Created at: 2025-07-01 21:34:05
Final Answer:
RenderedRaw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let’s break down the task and answer each part step by step.
---
### **Given Table (Predecessor List)**
| Job | Predecessors | Job | Predecessors | Job | Predecessors |
|-----|--------------|-----|--------------|-----|--------------|
| A | - | F | A, B, C | K | G |
| B | - | G | C | L | F, G, K |
| C | - | H | D, E | M | H, I |
| D | A, B | I | D, E, F | N | H, I, J, L |
| E | A, B, C | J | F, G | O | J, K, L |
| P | M, N | Q | P | R | J, K, L, O |
| S | N, Q, R | | | | |
---
## **A. Which (if any) predecessors could be eliminated without affecting the network logic?**
**Step 1: Understand the Question**
We need to find if any predecessors are redundant, i.e., is there a case where a job is listed as a predecessor, but is already a predecessor through another path (indirect dependency)? If so, it can be eliminated.
**Step 2: Check for Redundant Predecessors**
Let's check one by one for each job:
### **Job D: Predecessors = A, B**
- D depends on A and B.
### **Job E: Predecessors = A, B, C**
- E depends on A, B, and C.
### **Job F: Predecessors = A, B, C**
- F depends on A, B, and C.
### **Job G: Predecessor = C**
- G depends on C.
### **Job H: Predecessors = D, E**
- H depends on D and E.
### **Job I: Predecessors = D, E, F**
- I depends on D, E, F.
- Is any of D or E already a predecessor via F?
- F’s predecessors: A, B, C.
- D’s predecessors: A, B.
- E’s predecessors: A, B, C.
- No overlap, so all are necessary.
### **Job J: Predecessors = F, G**
- J depends on F and G.
- F’s predecessors: A, B, C.
- G’s predecessor: C.
- Since F already needs C, G is not redundant because G is a separate job.
### **Job K: Predecessor = G**
- K depends on G.
### **Job L: Predecessors = F, G, K**
- L depends on F, G, K.
- K depends on G.
- So, if L depends on K, and K depends on G, is G redundant?
- But L also directly depends on G. Let's check if this is redundant:
- If K is finished, G must be finished, but G could finish before K. So, G as a predecessor is not redundant.
- F: No overlap.
### **Job M: Predecessors = H, I**
- M depends on H and I.
### **Job N: Predecessors = H, I, J, L**
- N depends on H, I, J, L.
### **Job O: Predecessors = J, K, L**
- O depends on J, K, L.
### **Job P: Predecessors = M, N**
- P depends on M, N.
### **Job Q: Predecessor = P**
- Q depends on P.
### **Job R: Predecessors = J, K, L, O**
- R depends on J, K, L, O.
- O depends on J, K, L.
- Therefore, if O is finished, J, K, L must also be finished.
- **Thus, J, K, L are redundant as direct predecessors for R. The only necessary predecessor is O.**
### **Job S: Predecessors = N, Q, R**
- S depends on N, Q, R.
---
### **Summary Table of Redundant Predecessors**
- **R: J, K, L are redundant, because O already depends on J, K, L. So, R only needs O as a predecessor.**
---
## **A. Final Answer**
**Redundant Predecessors that could be eliminated:**
- For job R, the predecessors J, K, and L can be eliminated since O is already a predecessor and O depends on J, K, and L.
---
## **B. Draw an Arrow Diagram for the Project**
This is more visual, but here are the steps:
### **Step 1: Start with Jobs without Predecessors**
- A, B, C
### **Step 2: Add Jobs with their Predecessors**
- D (A, B)
- E (A, B, C)
- F (A, B, C)
- G (C)
**...and so on, following the table and using the cleaned-up predecessor list for R (only O).**
### **Step 3: Continue Adding Jobs in Order**
- H (D, E)
- I (D, E, F)
- J (F, G)
- K (G)
- L (F, G, K)
- M (H, I)
- N (H, I, J, L)
- O (J, K, L)
- P (M, N)
- Q (P)
- R (O) **[after removing redundant predecessors]**
- S (N, Q, R)
You can now draw the network diagram (Activity-on-Arrow or Activity-on-Node) based on these relationships.
---
### **How to Draw (Textual Representation):**
```
A B C
| \ /| |\
| D | | \
| / \| | \
E F G \
\ | | \
\ | | \
\ | | \
H I K
/ \ / \ /
M N J---/
\ / \
P L
| |
Q O
\ /
R
|
S
```
- **Note**: In the actual arrow diagram, you’d use arrows to show dependencies directly.
---
## **Summary**
**A.** The only redundant predecessors are for Job R (J, K, L), as O already depends on them.
**B.** Draw the network diagram as described, with arrows showing each job’s dependencies, using the cleaned-up list for R.
If you want, I can sketch a simple diagram and upload it for you! Let me know if you want that.
VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.
Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.