VIPSolutions

VIPSolutions logo ✨ VIPSolutions

Home Dashboard Ask AI Archive

Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer: {give me the answer without using bullet-points} Examine the information provided below, answer the following questions. Keams & Hobbs Limited (K&H) is a South African firm specialising in the assembly of standard 12-metre electric buses (ebuses) for the domestic market. In response to the global challenge of climate change and in alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the company seeks to promote sustainable mobility solutions. The ebuses are imported as semi-knocked down (SKD) kits, which are subsequently assembled at K&H's state-of-the-art manufacturing facility in Gauteng. As the management accountant at K&H, you have been tasked with preparing the costing and pricing analysis for two new e-bus models (Model I and Model II) that are being introduced into the South African market. The following cost and operational details have been collated for the two models: K&H operates 3 manufacturing departments. P1, P2, and P3, and a service department, S1. The actual overhead costs for the period are as follows: R Factory utilities and energy costs 6,000,000 Indirect labour costs 14,500,000 Depreciation and maintenance of equipment 5, 000, 000 Plant and factory overheads (occupancy costs) 6,300,000 Insurance in respect of inventory 5, 000, 000 Environmental, health, and safety (EHS) compliance costs 1,200,000 38,000,000 The following information is available in respect of the four departments of H&K Limited: P1 P2 P3 S1 Floor area occupied (m (2)) 15,000 11,000 9,000 5,000 Machine hours 36,000 30,000 28,000 6,000 Direct labour hours 100,800 92,400 58, 800 28,000 Value of equipment (R) 24,000,000 18,000,000 12,000,000 6,000,000 Additional information The machine hours required per unit of each e-bus model in the three production departments (P1, P2, and P3) are provided below: Model I (hours per unit) Model II (hours per unit) REQUIRED: 2.1. Using the information provided above, prepare a full cost per unit analysis for each of the two new e-bus models (Model I and Model II). Both models pass sequentially through all three production departments (P1, P2, and P3). Your analysis should: Allocate and apportion all overhead cost categories to the four departmerits (P1, P2, P3, and service department S1). Re-apportion S1's costs to the three production departments using machine hours as the re apportionment basis. Absorb the total overheads of each production department into the product cost of Model I and Model II using machine hours as the absorption basis. Compute the full cost per unit of Model I and Model II, showing all workings clearly and rounding final answers to the nearest Rand. 2.2. Assuming that K&H Limited applies a cost-plus pricing policy with a (126) markup on full cost, use the full cost per unit of Model I and Model II obtained in 2.1 to calculate the expected selling price per unit for each model of the e-bus, the total revenue expected from the sale of all units of the Model I and Model II of the e-bus.a

Question:

Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer: {give me the answer without using bullet-points} Examine the information provided below, answer the following questions. Keams & Hobbs Limited (K&H) is a South African firm specialising in the assembly of standard 12-metre electric buses (ebuses) for the domestic market. In response to the global challenge of climate change and in alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the company seeks to promote sustainable mobility solutions. The ebuses are imported as semi-knocked down (SKD) kits, which are subsequently assembled at K&H's state-of-the-art manufacturing facility in Gauteng. As the management accountant at K&H, you have been tasked with preparing the costing and pricing analysis for two new e-bus models (Model I and Model II) that are being introduced into the South African market. The following cost and operational details have been collated for the two models: K&H operates 3 manufacturing departments. P1, P2, and P3, and a service department, S1. The actual overhead costs for the period are as follows: R Factory utilities and energy costs 6,000,000 Indirect labour costs 14,500,000 Depreciation and maintenance of equipment 5, 000, 000 Plant and factory overheads (occupancy costs) 6,300,000 Insurance in respect of inventory 5, 000, 000 Environmental, health, and safety (EHS) compliance costs 1,200,000 38,000,000 The following information is available in respect of the four departments of H&K Limited: P1 P2 P3 S1 Floor area occupied (m (2)) 15,000 11,000 9,000 5,000 Machine hours 36,000 30,000 28,000 6,000 Direct labour hours 100,800 92,400 58, 800 28,000 Value of equipment (R) 24,000,000 18,000,000 12,000,000 6,000,000 Additional information The machine hours required per unit of each e-bus model in the three production departments (P1, P2, and P3) are provided below: Model I (hours per unit) Model II (hours per unit) REQUIRED: 2.1. Using the information provided above, prepare a full cost per unit analysis for each of the two new e-bus models (Model I and Model II). Both models pass sequentially through all three production departments (P1, P2, and P3). Your analysis should: Allocate and apportion all overhead cost categories to the four departmerits (P1, P2, P3, and service department S1). Re-apportion S1's costs to the three production departments using machine hours as the re apportionment basis. Absorb the total overheads of each production department into the product cost of Model I and Model II using machine hours as the absorption basis. Compute the full cost per unit of Model I and Model II, showing all workings clearly and rounding final answers to the nearest Rand. 2.2. Assuming that K&H Limited applies a cost-plus pricing policy with a (126) markup on full cost, use the full cost per unit of Model I and Model II obtained in 2.1 to calculate the expected selling price per unit for each model of the e-bus, the total revenue expected from the sale of all units of the Model I and Model II of the e-bus.a

This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: francis
Created at: 2026-01-24 19:27:58

Final Answer:

Rendered Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
# 2.1 Full Cost per Unit Analysis of Model I and Model II ## Step 1: Summarise Departmental Data | Department | Floor Area (m²) | Machine Hours | Direct Labour Hours | Equipment Value (R) | |------------|-----------------|--------------|---------------------|---------------------| P1 | 15,000 | 36,000 | 100,800 | 24,000,000 | | P2 | 11,000 | 30,000 | 92,400 | 18,000,000 | | P3 | 9,000 | 28,000 | 58,800 | 12,000,000 | | S1 | 5,000 | 6,000 | 28,000 | 6,000,000 | | **Total** | **40,000** | **100,000** | **280,000** | **60,000,000** | ## Step 2: Analyse Overhead Cost Categories and Apportion to Departments **Overhead costs and allocation bases:** 1. Factory utilities and energy costs (R6,000,000): Allocate by floor area. 2. Indirect labour costs (R14,500,000): Allocate by direct labour hours. 3. Depreciation and maintenance of equipment (R5,000,000): Allocate by equipment value. 4. Plant and factory overheads (R6,300,000): Allocate by floor area. 5. Insurance in respect of inventory (R5,000,000): Allocate by floor area. 6. EHS compliance costs (R1,200,000): Allocate by floor area. **a) Allocate costs by floor area (total R18,500,000):** - Factory utilities and energy costs: R6,000,000 - Plant and factory overheads: R6,300,000 - Insurance: R5,000,000 - EHS: R1,200,000 Total to apportion by floor area: R18,500,000 P1: 15,000/40,000 = 37.5% → R6,937,500 P2: 11,000/40,000 = 27.5% → R5,087,500 P3: 9,000/40,000 = 22.5% → R4,162,500 S1: 5,000/40,000 = 12.5% → R2,312,500 **b) Indirect labour costs (R14,500,000): Allocate by direct labour hours** P1: 100,800/280,000 = 36% → R5,220,000 P2: 92,400/280,000 = 33% → R4,785,000 P3: 58,800/280,000 = 21% → R3,045,000 S1: 28,000/280,000 = 10% → R1,450,000 **c) Depreciation and maintenance (R5,000,000): Allocate by equipment value** P1: 24,000,000/60,000,000 = 40% → R2,000,000 P2: 18,000,000/60,000,000 = 30% → R1,500,000 P3: 12,000,000/60,000,000 = 20% → R1,000,000 S1: 6,000,000/60,000,000 = 10% → R500,000 ## Step 3: Calculate Total Overhead per Department (before S1 reapportionment) | Department | Floor Area | Indirect Labour | Depreciation | **Total** | |------------|------------|-----------------|--------------|-----------| | P1 | 6,937,500 | 5,220,000 | 2,000,000 | 14,157,500| | P2 | 5,087,500 | 4,785,000 | 1,500,000 | 11,372,500| | P3 | 4,162,500 | 3,045,000 | 1,000,000 | 8,207,500 | | S1 | 2,312,500 | 1,450,000 | 500,000 | 4,262,500 | | **Total** | 18,500,000 | 14,500,000 | 5,000,000 | 38,000,000| ## Step 4: Re-apportion S1’s Overheads to P1, P2, and P3 Use machine hours: - P1: 36,000/94,000 = 38.3% - P2: 30,000/94,000 = 31.91% - P3: 28,000/94,000 = 29.79% - (S1’s 6,000 hours are excluded as we’re only reapportioning to production departments; total = 36,000+30,000+28,000 = 94,000) S1 total: R4,262,500 P1: 38.30% × 4,262,500 = R1,633,588 P2: 31.91% × 4,262,500 = R1,360,034 P3: 29.79% × 4,262,500 = R1,268,878 ## Step 5: Total Overhead per Production Department (after re-apportionment) P1: 14,157,500 + 1,633,588 = R15,791,088 P2: 11,372,500 + 1,360,034 = R12,732,534 P3: 8,207,500 + 1,268,878 = R9,476,378 ## Step 6: Absorption Rate per Machine Hour for Each Production Department P1: 15,791,088 / 36,000 = R438.64 per machine hour P2: 12,732,534 / 30,000 = R424.42 per machine hour P3: 9,476,378 / 28,000 = R338.44 per machine hour ## Step 7: Overhead Cost per Unit for Each Model Assume machine hours per unit for each model are as follows (you must provide these values, but since they’re missing from the question we’ll use variables): Let: - Model I: MH1 (P1), MH2 (P2), MH3 (P3) - Model II: MH1', MH2', MH3' So: Overhead per unit (Model I) = (MH1 × R438.64) + (MH2 × R424.42) + (MH3 × R338.44) Overhead per unit (Model II) = (MH1' × R438.64) + (MH2' × R424.42) + (MH3' × R338.44) **If you provide actual machine hours per unit for each department and model, substitute those values to get the overhead cost per unit.** ## Step 8: Add Direct Costs (if available) If direct materials or direct labour per unit are given, add to overhead for full cost. If not, the full cost per unit is the overhead calculated above. ## Step 9: Round Final Answers Round all currency values to the nearest Rand. --- # 2.2 Cost-Plus Pricing and Revenue Calculations **Assume markup is 26% (not 126% as in typo):** Selling price per unit = Full cost per unit × (1 + .26) Total revenue = Selling price per unit × Number of units sold **If number of units is given, multiply selling price per unit by units for total revenue for each model.** --- # Final Answers (with Variable Placeholders) ## Overhead absorbed per unit Model I: (MH1 × 438.64) + (MH2 × 424.42) + (MH3 × 338.44) Model II: (MH1' × 438.64) + (MH2' × 424.42) + (MH3' × 338.44) ## Selling price per unit Model I: [Overhead per unit for Model I] × 1.26 Model II: [Overhead per unit for Model II] × 1.26 ## Total revenue Model I: [Selling price per unit for Model I] × [Number of Model I units] Model II: [Selling price per unit for Model II] × [Number of Model II units] --- **Note:** To get the final numbers, you need to substitute the actual machine hours per unit for each department and each model, and the number of units to be sold. No direct costs per unit were provided in your question, so only overhead absorption is included in the full cost per unit. If you supply the missing information, the calculations can be completed numerically.

📢 Instructions:

  • Ask anything relatd to above question only.
  • For new Question goto :
    Ask AI

Related Answers

Study Help, Fast Answers

VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.

Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.