Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:Consider the fields E(x, t) = G(kx - ckt) and B(x, t) = c* (-1)e_(k) \times E(x , where G-k = 0, k = [kl e.(K) = (k)/(K) and prove that they satisfy the homogeneous Maxwell equations in vacuum.
Question:
Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:
Consider the fields E(x, t) = G(kx - ckt) and B(x, t) = c* (-1)e_(k) \times E(x
, where G-k = 0, k = [kl e.(K) = (k)/(K) and prove that they satisfy the
homogeneous Maxwell equations in vacuum.
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: ppp
Created at: 2025-05-27 11:05:56
Asked by: ppp
Created at: 2025-05-27 11:05:56
Final Answer:
Rendered
Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's carefully **prove that the given fields** satisfy the **homogeneous Maxwell equations in vacuum**.
Given:
- \(\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t) = G(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{x} - ckt)\)
- \(\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{x}, t) = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t)\)
- where \(\mathbf{e}_k = \frac{\mathbf{k}}{k}\), \(k = |\mathbf{k}|\)
- \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{k} = 0\), so \(\mathbf{k}\) is constant.
The **homogeneous Maxwell equations** in vacuum are:
\[
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0
\]
\[
\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}
\]
---
### **Step 1: Compute \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}\)**
Given:
\[
\mathbf{B} = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}
\]
\[
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = \nabla \cdot [c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}]
\]
But \(\mathbf{e}_k\) is a constant vector (since \(\mathbf{k}\) is constant), and \(c\) is a constant:
\[
\nabla \cdot (\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{F}) = \mathbf{a} \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{F}) - \mathbf{F} \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{a}) = \mathbf{a} \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{F})
\]
since \(\nabla \times \mathbf{a} = 0\).
Therefore,
\[
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{E})
\]
But let's see what \(\nabla \times \mathbf{E}\) is.
---
### **Step 2: Compute \(\nabla \times \mathbf{E}\)**
\[
\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t) = G(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{x} - ckt)
\]
So, \(\mathbf{E}\) is a function of \(\phi = \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{x} - ckt\).
The gradient operator acts as:
\[
\nabla G(\phi) = (\nabla \phi) G'(\phi) = \mathbf{k} G'(\phi)
\]
But we need the curl:
\[
\nabla \times \mathbf{E}
\]
If \(\mathbf{E}\) is **parallel to some direction** (say, polarization vector \(\mathbf{E}_0\)), then:
\[
\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t) = \mathbf{E}_0 G(\phi)
\]
where \(\mathbf{E}_0\) is a **constant vector** perpendicular to \(\mathbf{k}\).
So,
\[
\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \nabla \times [\mathbf{E}_0 G(\phi)] = \mathbf{E}_0 \times \nabla G(\phi) = \mathbf{E}_0 \times \mathbf{k} G'(\phi)
\]
---
### **Step 3: Compute \(\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}\)**
Recall:
\[
\mathbf{B} = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}
\]
So,
\[
\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}
\]
But,
\[
\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} = \mathbf{E}_0 \frac{\partial}{\partial t} G(\phi) = \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi) \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} = \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi) (-ck) = -ck \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi)
\]
Thus,
\[
\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times [-ck \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi)] = -k \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi)
\]
---
### **Step 4: Compare \(\nabla \times \mathbf{E}\) and \(-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}\)**
We have:
\[
\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \mathbf{E}_0 \times \mathbf{k} G'(\phi) = -\mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi)
\]
and
\[
-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} = k \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi)
\]
But \(\mathbf{e}_k = \mathbf{k}/k\), so
\[
k \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}_0 = \mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}_0
\]
Therefore,
\[
\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi) = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}
\]
**First homogeneous Maxwell equation is satisfied.**
---
### **Step 5: Compute \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}\) again**
Recall:
\[
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{E})
\]
But as above,
\[
\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi)
\]
So,
\[
\mathbf{e}_k \cdot (\mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}_0) = (\mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{k}) \cdot \mathbf{E}_0 = 0
\]
because \(\mathbf{e}_k\) is parallel to \(\mathbf{k}\); their cross product is zero.
Thus,
\[
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0
\]
**Second homogeneous Maxwell equation is satisfied.**
---
## **Final Answer**
**The given fields:**
\[
\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t) = G(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{x} - ckt)
\]
\[
\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{x}, t) = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t)
\]
**with \(\mathbf{e}_k = \mathbf{k}/k\), \(k = |\mathbf{k}|\), and \(\mathbf{E}_0 \cdot \mathbf{k} = 0\),**
**satisfy the homogeneous Maxwell equations in vacuum:**
\[
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0, \quad \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}
\]
**as shown above.**
📢 Instructions:
- Ask anything relatd to above question only.
- For new Question goto :
VIPSolutions