VIPSolutions logo ✨ VIPSolutions

Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:Consider the fields E(x, t) = G(kx - ckt) and B(x, t) = c* (-1)e_(k) \times E(x , where G-k = 0, k = [kl e.(K) = (k)/(K) and prove that they satisfy the homogeneous Maxwell equations in vacuum.

Question:

Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:Uploaded ImageConsider the fields E(x, t) = G(kx - ckt) and B(x, t) = c* (-1)e_(k) \times E(x , where G-k = 0, k = [kl e.(K) = (k)/(K) and prove that they satisfy the homogeneous Maxwell equations in vacuum.

This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: ppp
Created at: 2025-05-27 11:05:56

Final Answer:

Rendered Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's carefully **prove that the given fields** satisfy the **homogeneous Maxwell equations in vacuum**. Given: - \(\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t) = G(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{x} - ckt)\) - \(\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{x}, t) = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t)\) - where \(\mathbf{e}_k = \frac{\mathbf{k}}{k}\), \(k = |\mathbf{k}|\) - \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{k} = 0\), so \(\mathbf{k}\) is constant. The **homogeneous Maxwell equations** in vacuum are: \[ \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0 \] \[ \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \] --- ### **Step 1: Compute \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}\)** Given: \[ \mathbf{B} = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E} \] \[ \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = \nabla \cdot [c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}] \] But \(\mathbf{e}_k\) is a constant vector (since \(\mathbf{k}\) is constant), and \(c\) is a constant: \[ \nabla \cdot (\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{F}) = \mathbf{a} \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{F}) - \mathbf{F} \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{a}) = \mathbf{a} \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{F}) \] since \(\nabla \times \mathbf{a} = 0\). Therefore, \[ \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{E}) \] But let's see what \(\nabla \times \mathbf{E}\) is. --- ### **Step 2: Compute \(\nabla \times \mathbf{E}\)** \[ \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t) = G(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{x} - ckt) \] So, \(\mathbf{E}\) is a function of \(\phi = \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{x} - ckt\). The gradient operator acts as: \[ \nabla G(\phi) = (\nabla \phi) G'(\phi) = \mathbf{k} G'(\phi) \] But we need the curl: \[ \nabla \times \mathbf{E} \] If \(\mathbf{E}\) is **parallel to some direction** (say, polarization vector \(\mathbf{E}_0\)), then: \[ \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t) = \mathbf{E}_0 G(\phi) \] where \(\mathbf{E}_0\) is a **constant vector** perpendicular to \(\mathbf{k}\). So, \[ \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \nabla \times [\mathbf{E}_0 G(\phi)] = \mathbf{E}_0 \times \nabla G(\phi) = \mathbf{E}_0 \times \mathbf{k} G'(\phi) \] --- ### **Step 3: Compute \(\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}\)** Recall: \[ \mathbf{B} = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E} \] So, \[ \frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} \] But, \[ \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} = \mathbf{E}_0 \frac{\partial}{\partial t} G(\phi) = \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi) \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} = \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi) (-ck) = -ck \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi) \] Thus, \[ \frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times [-ck \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi)] = -k \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi) \] --- ### **Step 4: Compare \(\nabla \times \mathbf{E}\) and \(-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}\)** We have: \[ \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \mathbf{E}_0 \times \mathbf{k} G'(\phi) = -\mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi) \] and \[ -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} = k \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi) \] But \(\mathbf{e}_k = \mathbf{k}/k\), so \[ k \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}_0 = \mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}_0 \] Therefore, \[ \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi) = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \] **First homogeneous Maxwell equation is satisfied.** --- ### **Step 5: Compute \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}\) again** Recall: \[ \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{E}) \] But as above, \[ \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}_0 G'(\phi) \] So, \[ \mathbf{e}_k \cdot (\mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}_0) = (\mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{k}) \cdot \mathbf{E}_0 = 0 \] because \(\mathbf{e}_k\) is parallel to \(\mathbf{k}\); their cross product is zero. Thus, \[ \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0 \] **Second homogeneous Maxwell equation is satisfied.** --- ## **Final Answer** **The given fields:** \[ \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t) = G(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{x} - ckt) \] \[ \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{x}, t) = c^{-1} \mathbf{e}_k \times \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t) \] **with \(\mathbf{e}_k = \mathbf{k}/k\), \(k = |\mathbf{k}|\), and \(\mathbf{E}_0 \cdot \mathbf{k} = 0\),** **satisfy the homogeneous Maxwell equations in vacuum:** \[ \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0, \quad \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \] **as shown above.**

📢 Instructions:

  • Ask anything relatd to above question only.
  • For new Question goto :

Study Help, Fast Answers

VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.

Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.