Did you like this answer?
👍 0
👎 0
Let's solve each part step-by-step:
---
## **Given Data**
### **Payoff Table**
| Product | Favorable (0.2) | Stable (0.7) | Unfavorable (0.1) |
|----------|-----------------|--------------|-------------------|
| Widget | $120,000 | $70,000 | -$30,000 |
| Hummer | $60,000 | $40,000 | $20,000 |
| Nimnot | $35,000 | $30,000 | $30,000 |
---
## **(a) Compute the expected value for each decision and select the best one.**
**Expected Value (EV) formula:**
\[
EV = P_1 \times V_1 + P_2 \times V_2 + P_3 \times V_3
\]
where \( P \) = probability, \( V \) = value
### **Widget:**
\[
EV_{Widget} = (0.2 \times 120,000) + (0.7 \times 70,000) + (0.1 \times -30,000)
\]
\[
= 24,000 + 49,000 - 3,000 = \boxed{70,000}
\]
### **Hummer:**
\[
EV_{Hummer} = (0.2 \times 60,000) + (0.7 \times 40,000) + (0.1 \times 20,000)
\]
\[
= 12,000 + 28,000 + 2,000 = \boxed{42,000}
\]
### **Nimnot:**
\[
EV_{Nimnot} = (0.2 \times 35,000) + (0.7 \times 30,000) + (0.1 \times 30,000)
\]
\[
= 7,000 + 21,000 + 3,000 = \boxed{31,000}
\]
### **Best Decision:**
**Widget** has the highest expected value (**$70,000**).
---
## **(b) Develop the opportunity loss table and compute the expected opportunity loss for each product.**
### **Step 1: Find the best payoff for each state of nature:**
- Favorable: max(120,000; 60,000; 35,000) = **120,000**
- Stable: max(70,000; 40,000; 30,000) = **70,000**
- Unfavorable: max(-30,000; 20,000; 30,000) = **30,000**
### **Step 2: Construct Opportunity Loss Table:**
\[
\text{Opportunity Loss} = \text{Best Payoff for State} - \text{Payoff for Product}
\]
| Product | Favorable | Stable | Unfavorable |
|----------|-----------|--------|-------------|
| Widget | 0 | 0 | 60,000 |
| Hummer | 60,000 | 30,000 | 10,000 |
| Nimnot | 85,000 | 40,000 | 0 |
### **Step 3: Compute Expected Opportunity Loss (EOL) for Each Product**
#### **Widget:**
\[
EOL_{Widget} = (0.2 \times 0) + (0.7 \times 0) + (0.1 \times 60,000) = 0 + 0 + 6,000 = \boxed{6,000}
\]
#### **Hummer:**
\[
EOL_{Hummer} = (0.2 \times 60,000) + (0.7 \times 30,000) + (0.1 \times 10,000)
\]
\[
= 12,000 + 21,000 + 1,000 = \boxed{34,000}
\]
#### **Nimnot:**
\[
EOL_{Nimnot} = (0.2 \times 85,000) + (0.7 \times 40,000) + (0.1 \times 0)
\]
\[
= 17,000 + 28,000 + 0 = \boxed{45,000}
\]
### **Best Decision:**
**Widget** has the lowest expected opportunity loss (**$6,000**).
---
## **(c) Determine how much the firm would be willing to pay for perfect information (Expected Value of Perfect Information, EVPI).**
\[
\text{EVPI} = \text{Expected Value with Perfect Information (EVwPI)} - \text{Maximum Expected Value (EV)}
\]
### **Step 1: EVwPI**
For each state, choose the best payoff and multiply by the probability:
\[
EVwPI = (0.2 \times 120,000) + (0.7 \times 70,000) + (0.1 \times 30,000)
\]
\[
= 24,000 + 49,000 + 3,000 = \boxed{76,000}
\]
### **Step 2: Maximum Expected Value (from part a):**
\[
= 70,000 \quad (\text{Widget})
\]
### **Step 3: Calculate EVPI**
\[
\text{EVPI} = 76,000 - 70,000 = \boxed{6,000}
\]
---
## **Summary of Answers**
**a.** Expected values:
- Widget: **$70,000** (Best Decision)
- Hummer: $42,000
- Nimnot: $31,000
**b.** Expected Opportunity Losses:
- Widget: **$6,000** (Best Decision)
- Hummer: $34,000
- Nimnot: $45,000
**c.** The firm would be willing to pay up to **$6,000** for perfect information about future market conditions.
---
**If you need the tables typed up or any clarifications, let me know!**